Let’s keep dogs off the witness stand.

The news video in our office elevator, appropriately called “Captivate Network,”  recently announced that the San Francisco Airport has appointed a pig named LiLou as its official therapy animal. LiLou, who wears a tutu and plays a toy piano, is no doubt a great comfort to people standing in line waiting to be strip-searched by the TSA.

Therapy pig

“All flights are canceled at this time.”

There’s also Therapy Hattie, who’s just been sworn into the Illinois State Attorney’s Office.

Hatty Illinois state attorney

“This is not Brady material!”

And then there are therapy dogs on the witness stand.  To appeal to the jury’s sympathy and bolster the credibility of child complainants, right?

“Absolutely not!” yips the Courthouse Dogs Foundation, a distinctly victims’-rights- oriented outfit zealously promoting its four-legged product to courtrooms nationwide.

“Many defense attorneys are concerned,” they sniff, “that the presence of a dog could cause sympathy towards the witness or make it seem like the witness is more credible.” But if the judge instructs the jury that the adorable pooch nuzzling the complainant is merely there to create “a more calming supportive setting for this witness,” and that the jury is “not to credit the witness’ testimony in any way simply because of the presence of the dog,” why then, Bob’s your uncle!

Oh, yeah? Well, the same doggy website features a glowing article by a hard-bitten prosecutor about how she was just about to kick an incorrigible teenager off a drug program and throw her in the can when Jeeter the Therapy Dog came to save the day:

Jeeter approached the table where Chelsea was seated, put his two paws up on it and reached his head towards her. Chelsea dissolved into tears and buried her head into Jeeter’s neck. After she composed herself she turned to all of us and said, “See, Jeeter thinks I can get sober.  Please give me another chance.”

We were so moved by the interaction between the two of them that we put our best judgment aside and agreed that she could have one last chance.

Now if that doesn’t bring tears to your eyes, you must be a terrible person. Trouble is, it confirms exactly what’s wrong with putting Jeeter on the witness stand. “See, Jeeter thinks I’m telling the truth. Please convict the defendant!”

Dog in ctrm



h/t to https://sammons-criminal-law.com/blog/

About Appellate Squawk

A satirical blog for criminal defense lawyers and their friends who won't give up without a squawk.
This entry was posted in Law & Parody, Satirical cartoons and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Let’s keep dogs off the witness stand.

  1. Alex Bunin says:

    If I thought bringing Finn and Charlie to court would help any client, I would. However, energetic 60-pound Airedales would likely cause mass hysteria and bring threats of contempt toward their human.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Alex Bunin says:

    Airedale Temperament and Personality
    The Airedale is a hard-working, independent, and athletic dog with a lot of drive, energy and endurance. He is prone to dig, chase, and bark, behaviors that come naturally to terrier breeds. These traits can be frustrating to owners who are unfamiliar with the Airedale personality.


    • Of course you know Thurber’s piece about his family’s Airedale Muggs, “The Dog That Bit People.” “Mother used to send a box of candy every Christmas to the people the Airedale bit. The list finally contained forty or more names.” We say bring your Airedales to court and see what happens.


  3. Pingback: My cup of joy is full | Law Office of Anna P. Sammons

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.